AI ARCHITECTURE Text to animated diagram in seconds

Explain any AI architecture in 30 seconds

Type the calls as arrows and get a diagram that animates them in the order they happen, ready to drop into a slide deck or an architecture review. It does not matter whether the agents were built with LangGraph, with CrewAI, with the OpenAI Agents SDK or by hand.

< 30s

to first diagram

6

starter templates

WebM

video export

How it works

Text in, animated architecture out

⌨
STEP 1

Describe your agent architecture

Write the calls as arrows, in the order
they happen. Box names are free text

User -> Agent -> Tool -> API
⚡
STEP 2

Watch the data flow

A message moves along the arrows hop by hop,
so the order of the calls is visible

User ~~→ Agent ~~→ Tool
📹
STEP 3

Export and share

A WebM video and a PNG still, right from this page.
The other four (WebP, GIF, MP4, PDF) from the app after a free sign-up, all six of them free

→ agent-arch.webm (1.4 MB)

AI architecture diagram features

From simple agents to complex multi-agent orchestration

🤖

Multi-Agent Systems

A coordinator handing work to three sub-agents is one line with braces, and the animation shows the task reaching each of them. Supervisor and swarm patterns are the same arrows, with extra lines for the handoffs back.

📚

RAG Pipelines

Embedding, vector search, context, LLM: one line, and the query is animated through every stage and back to the user. The names are free text, so the vector database box can carry the name of the one you run.

🔧

Tool Call Workflows

The agent asks the LLM, the LLM picks a tool, the tool calls an API and the answer comes back up the same chain. Written as arrows and animated in that order, so a reviewer watches the round trip.

Open the human-in-the-loop example →

🔄

Fan-Out Orchestration

Braces send one message to several workers at once, and a second line brings the results back to the orchestrator. Orchestrator-worker and router patterns come out to a couple of lines of text.

AI architecture diagram examples

Common patterns: type these and watch the animated data flow

Single Agent with Tool Calls

User sends a query, the LLM agent reasons, calls an external API, and returns a response. The most basic agentic pattern.

User -> LLM Agent -> API Tool -> LLM Agent
LLM Agent -> User

Open the ReAct tool-calling example →

Multi-Agent Coordinator

A coordinator agent distributes tasks to specialized sub-agents in parallel. Classic orchestrator-worker pattern used in CrewAI and LangGraph.

User -> Coordinator
Coordinator -> {Researcher, Writer, Reviewer}

Open the multi-agent router example →

RAG Pipeline

User query gets embedded, searched against a vector database, context is assembled, and the LLM generates a grounded response.

User -> Embedder -> Vector DB -> Context
Context -> LLM -> User

Open the RAG pipeline example →

MCP Tool Server

An LLM agent uses the Model Context Protocol to connect to external tool servers. Emerging standard for agent interoperability.

LLM Agent -> MCP Client -> MCP Server
MCP Server -> {Database, API, FileSystem}

Open the MCP architecture diagram example →

Reflection Loop

Agent generates output, a critic evaluates it, and the agent refines. Iterative self-improvement pattern used in production systems.

User -> Generator Agent -> Critic Agent
Critic Agent -> Generator Agent -> User

Agentic RAG

An autonomous agent decides when to retrieve, which sources to query, and iteratively refines until the answer quality is sufficient.

User -> Agent -> {Vector DB, Web Search, Knowledge Graph}
Agent -> Evaluator -> Agent -> User

Framework-agnostic

Diagram any AI agent architecture, regardless of framework

LangGraph State graphs
CrewAI Crews & Flows
AutoGen Multi-agent
OpenAI SDK Agents SDK
Google ADK Agent Dev Kit
Custom Any architecture

Why animated agent diagrams

Static diagrams show what the system looks like. Animation shows how it works.

📄

Architecture reviews

Walk through agent reasoning flows step by step. Spot where tool calls bottleneck, where context is lost, where loops occur.

🎤

Conference talks

Export animated diagrams as WebM video for slides. Show audiences how multi-agent systems coordinate in real time.

📐

System design

Prototype agent architectures before coding. Try different orchestration patterns and see how data flows through each one.

👥

Stakeholder communication

Non-technical stakeholders understand animated flows instantly. Show them how the AI agent actually processes their request.

AI architecture diagram tools compared

Why AI engineers switch from Mermaid and Excalidraw

Feature Chartado Mermaid Excalidraw Eraser.io Lucidchart
Animated data flow Yes No No No No
Text/code input Yes Yes No AI No
Video export WebM, MP4 No No No No
Multi-agent fan-out Native Manual Manual Manual Manual
Request-response animation Yes No No No No
Version control friendly Yes Yes JSON No No

Built for the AI architecture era

Static diagrams show structure. Animated diagrams show behavior.

⚡

30 seconds to first diagram

No signup, no install, no drag-and-drop. Type your architecture in plain text and see the animated result immediately. Works in any browser.

📹

Export as video for presentations

Record your animated architecture as WebM video, or as MP4 after a free sign-up. Drop it into slide decks, Notion docs, or Slack threads.

🔀

Version control friendly

Your diagram is a single line of text. Diff it, commit it, review it in PRs. When the architecture changes, update one line, not fifty drag-and-drop boxes.

Frequently asked questions

About AI architecture diagrams

What is an AI architecture diagram?

The boxes are the components (the LLM, the agents, the tools they call, a vector database) and the arrows are the calls between them. A static diagram does not show the order of those calls, and in an agent system the order is most of the design. Chartado animates it: type User -> Agent -> LLM -> Tool -> Agent -> User and a message moves along that path one hop at a time, so a reviewer sees the tool call happen after the LLM has decided on it.

How do I create a RAG architecture diagram?

Type User -> Embedding -> Vector DB -> Context -> LLM -> User and Chartado draws it. The animation then carries the query through embedding and retrieval, into the context and on to the LLM, and brings the answer back to the user, which is the part a static drawing leaves out. The box names are free text, so Vector DB can be Pinecone or Qdrant (or ChromaDB, or whatever you run) and LLM can be the model you actually call.

What is the best tool for AI architecture diagrams?

Depends what the diagram is for. For a static picture Mermaid does the job and diffs in a PR. If the point is to show the order in which things get called, Chartado animates it from one line of text, without an account and at no cost. The exports are free as well: WebM and PNG from the editor on this page without an account, the other four (WebP, GIF, MP4, PDF) from the app after a free sign-up.

Can I use Chartado with LangGraph, CrewAI, or OpenAI Agents SDK?

Yes, because Chartado never sees your code. You type the shape of the system, which nodes exist and who calls whom, and that shape looks the same whether it came out of a LangGraph state graph, a CrewAI crew, an AutoGen multi-agent system, an OpenAI Agents SDK handoff chain or a Google ADK agent. Nothing to install and no integration to configure.

Can I export AI architecture diagrams as video?

Yes, WebM from the editor on this page without an account, and MP4 (H.264) from the app after a free sign-up, both free. The rest are free too: animated WebP and GIF for a README, and a still frame as PNG or PDF, with PNG from this page and WebP, GIF, PDF from the app after the same free sign-up. The video is what to put in a conference slide, so the audience sees the calls happen in order.

What is the difference between MCP and A2A protocols?

MCP (Model Context Protocol) covers the agent-to-tool side, how an agent connects to a tool server or a data source. A2A (Agent-to-Agent) covers the agent-to-agent side, how agents talk to each other. In Chartado the MCP part is an ordinary arrow, LLM Agent -> MCP Client -> MCP Server on one line, and the A2A part is usually a fan-out in braces, Router Agent -> {Research Agent, Code Agent} on the line below.

Your next architecture review, animated

Paste the architecture into the editor above and about 30 seconds later you have an animated diagram to send around. An account only comes in later, to save the diagram or for the exports that live in the app.

Try it free ↑